The $15 Minimum Wage Fight: Biden vs. the 5th Circuit and the Future of Government Contracts

A federal judge in Texas threw a wrench into President Biden's plan to raise the minimum wage for government contractors to $15 an hour, but the administration isn't letting go of its initiative. In the case of State of Texas et al v. Biden et al, the Judge Drew B. Tipton ruled that the Department of Labor (DOL) lacked the authority to implement such a sweeping change, potentially leaving hundreds of thousands of workers in limbo. Before we dive into the legal wrangling, let's unpack the context and potential consequences of this decision.

The DOL and Biden's Case: The administration argues that it is well within the DOL's power to set wage standards for government contracts, citing the Davis-Bacon Act, Walsh-Healey Act, and the Service Contract Act. These laws, they argue, unambiguously empower the DOL to set fair and reasonable wages for workers on federal contracts, with the aim of preventing unfair competition and protecting workers' livelihoods. The Biden administration believes a $15 minimum wage fits this criteria, boosting both economic fairness and worker productivity.

The U.S. District Court Ruling: The Texas judge, appointed by former President Donald Trump, disagrees. His ruling rests on a strict interpretation of the SCA and Walsh-Healey Act, applying a similar reasoning found in State of Louisiana v. Biden, No. 22-30019, (5th Cir. 2022). In that case, the 5th Circuit court determined that the Biden Administration did not have widespread authority to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations to federal contractors. The Texas federal court in this minimum wage case, applied this same logic to rule that President Biden’s 2021 $15 minimum wage executive order exceeded his authority under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act (“Procurement Act). Judge Tipton’s interpretation, if upheld, could significantly limit the DOL's power to regulate wages in the government contracting sector. We must note here however, that the impact of the U.S. District Court’s ruling only applies to Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, although this could change in the future, particularly where additional states pursue separate litigation or seek a declaratory judgment on this issue.

Impact on Small Businesses: While the legal arguments fly, small businesses caught in the crossfire are grappling with potential consequences. A higher minimum wage would undoubtedly increase their labor costs, potentially squeezing profit margins and forcing tough decisions about staffing and pricing. Some argue this could discourage participation in government contracts, ultimately reducing competition and potentially harming the government itself.

Frustrations and Future: Understandably, small businesses feel frustrated by the uncertainty and potential financial burden. Yet, it's crucial to acknowledge the human cost of the current minimum wage. Many low-wage government contractors struggle to make ends meet, forcing them into difficult choices and hindering their ability to contribute fully to the economy.

This legal battle is far from over. The Biden administration has already appealed the Texas ruling, taking it to the 5th Circuit and potentially even the Supreme Court. The Biden and the DOL filed its brief on January 22, 2024, and the Appellees (Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana), will have 30 days to respond, notwithstanding any requests for extension. The outcome will not only determine the fate of the $15 minimum wage for government contractors but could also set a crucial precedent for the DOL's future regulatory power in the sector. In the meantime, businesses and workers alike wait with bated breath, hopeful for a resolution that balances economic concerns with the needs of both employers and employees.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult with an attorney regarding your specific circumstances. If you need assistance understanding your rights and responsibilities as a federal government contractor, please contact our offices today to see how we can assist you navigate your legal concerns.

Kenesha Raeford

Business and Government Contracts attorney. Founder of KARLO Law.

https://KARLOLaw.com
Previous
Previous

D.C.'s Cashless Ban: Coins and Concerns Clash in the Capital

Next
Next

Paving the Way: Juanita Jackson Mitchell, Maryland's First Black Female Lawyer